Every data-backed claim must trace from the current E2 manifest to one admitted artefact, source snapshot and transformation method. The trace retains source URL, version, retrieval time, content hash, licence, freshness and quality status. A broken trace removes the affected value; it does not become zero or inherit provenance from a nearby record.
For UK EV data reviewed on 13 August 2026, provenance begins at the single E2 build manifest and follows the listed artefact to its source version, public locator, content hash, licence and transformation method. Nulls keep reason codes and never mean zero. The limit is snapshot integrity: mixed builds, fixtures, missing hashes or uncovered fields are rejected rather than repaired editorially.
How a published UK EV value is traced through the E2 manifest, source snapshot, licence, transformation method, quality status and null reason.
Snapshot boundary
One build identifier and generation time bind every E2 artefact in a snapshot. The manifest lists each permitted path with its byte count, SHA-256, record count and stable artefact ID. Records from different builds are not spliced together.
Source custody
The source-version record states which public source was retrieved, when it was retrieved, the source or snapshot version, its content SHA-256 and the applicable licence decision. Attribution follows the admitted source record; an audit-only or metadata-only source cannot contribute product values.
Transformation custody
Provenance maps the data subtree to source identifiers, public locators and a registered transformation method. The method register retains a version and code hash, allowing a derived output to be tied to the implementation that created it rather than to an undocumented spreadsheet step.
Null and quality custody
A null reason distinguishes not available, not observed yet, not applicable, small-sample suppression, licence withholding and source unavailability. Quality and freshness travel with the artefact. Empty-state means no safely publishable records, not a confirmed count of zero.
What to do next
Use provenance to audit a value's origin and transformation, not to infer vehicle condition beyond the published metric.
Immediate action: Follow the artefact's source version and method identifier before reusing a value.
Stop reuse if the manifest hash, source version, licence, freshness, method or field coverage cannot be verified.
Professional hand-off
Escalate a broken lineage or licence question to the data owner and editorial reviewer before publication or calculation.
Questions this record can answer
What does the sourced evidence say about snapshot boundary?
One build identifier and generation time bind every E2 artefact in a snapshot. The manifest lists each permitted path with its byte count, SHA-256, record count and stable artefact ID. Records from different builds are not spliced together.
What does the sourced evidence say about source custody?
The source-version record states which public source was retrieved, when it was retrieved, the source or snapshot version, its content SHA-256 and the applicable licence decision. Attribution follows the admitted source record; an audit-only or metadata-only source cannot contribute product values.
What does the sourced evidence say about transformation custody?
Provenance maps the data subtree to source identifiers, public locators and a registered transformation method. The method register retains a version and code hash, allowing a derived output to be tied to the implementation that created it rather than to an undocumented spreadsheet step.